May 22 2007, 01:13 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
http://www.kamc28.tv/news/default.asp?mode...ews&id=2323
QUOTE The crack-down on sexually oriented businesses continues, this time, targeting a local lingerie shop. Police raided the Somethin’ Sexy lingerie store at 53rd and Slide and arrested the clerk. The law states, you can`t have more than six of the same sexual item for sale. Several explicit items were confiscated during the raid. The owner, who asked to remain anonymous, says the raid is a waste of resources. "I think it`s unfair, I think it`s old fashioned†he says. “I`m sure they`ll be several people who will agree that the raid was necessary and these items should not be sold in Lubbock. But I also think a lot of people think that this is wasted man hour by the police department." No court date has been set for the store clerk. But if convicted, she would have to register as a sex offender. The shop remains open and the owner says they are selling everything that`s legal. Strip Clubs, Chippendale's, Lingerie Shops... Seriously, Lubbock...you backwards-ass, hick fucking community of fundamentalist bible-thumpers.... Is there not any better way to spend those police resources?!? FUCK -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 22 2007, 01:16 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,302 Joined: 20-February 07 Member No.: 721 |
Um... i doubt they are being charged with obscenity (and if they are the statute has been twisted it seems like)... considering the fact that "6 Identical items" in that statute refers to PRESUMING the person to be guilty of intent to distribute obscene material. If the material is obscene (and its a store that sells it) then you don't need the "6 item" thing.
QUOTE (e) A person who promotes or wholesale promotes obscene material or an obscene device or possesses the same with intent to promote or wholesale promote it in the course of his business is presumed to do so with knowledge of its content and character. (f) A person who possesses six or more obscene devices or identical or similar obscene articles is presumed to possess them with intent to promote the same. So yeah, im guessing its a zoning ordinance where in that zone you can't do the certain thing (over 6 items or what not) without being in violation of the zone and then maybe a presumtion of sex crime? Seems like a wierd law honestly if it takes selling more than 6 to equal a crime.... If only i wasn't too lazy to use my law school resources to look it up haha. (writing a paper) -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 22 2007, 01:27 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Fool Group: Members Posts: 2,127 Joined: 23-February 06 From: LBB Member No.: 56 |
Um... i doubt they are being charged with obscenity (and if they are the statute has been twisted it seems like)... considering the fact that "6 Identical items" in that statute refers to PRESUMING the person to be guilty of intent to distribute obscene material. If the material is obscene (and its a store that sells it) then you don't need the "6 item" thing. So yeah, im guessing its a zoning ordinance where in that zone you can't do the certain thing (over 6 items or what not) without being in violation of the zone and then maybe a presumtion of sex crime? Seems like a wierd law honestly if it takes selling more than 6 to equal a crime.... If only i wasn't too lazy to use my law school resources to look it up haha. (writing a paper) Nah, they're only presuming the person to be knowledgeable of the content and character of the material. Back to what the D.A. was talking about selling something as a sex toy vs selling something as a cake topping or whatever. The more than six part is there to mean that any person owning more than six must have possessed so many because they intended to sell them. Not sure why their even mentioning this either since he was selling the stuff openly. -------------------- Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
|
|
|
|
May 22 2007, 01:30 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,302 Joined: 20-February 07 Member No.: 721 |
Nah, they're only presuming the person to be knowledgeable of the content and character of the material. Back to what the D.A. was talking about selling something as a sex toy vs selling something as a cake topping or whatever. The more than six part is there to mean that any person owning more than six must have possessed so many because they intended to sell them. Not sure why their even mentioning this either since he was selling the stuff openly. QUOTE A person who possesses six or more obscene devices or identical or similar obscene articles is presumed to possess them with intent to promote the same. No it means that with 6 you are presumed to have intent to sell (promote, whatever), thats all it means. And if you are a store actively selling them, then the 6 items doesn't matter. The 6 items says nothing to the obscenity. If its obscene... and you intend to sell it (a store) then they can get you. The 6 item thing isn't even a factor. thats why im confused (if it is indeed an obscenity violation) -------------------- |
|
|
|
Psykopath Lingerie Store Raid May 22 2007, 01:13 AM
Dogmeat that's fucking rediculous ... May 22 2007, 06:18 AM
James I'm sure there's more to the story than wh... May 22 2007, 06:22 AM
James That makes it even more confusing!
QUOTE The ... May 22 2007, 08:39 AM
TinEqualWin Those who enforce shitty laws are just as guilty a... May 22 2007, 08:54 AM
James QUOTE (TinEqualWin @ May 22 2007, 09:54 A... May 22 2007, 09:16 AM
kcroxyoursox Everyone who is in Lubbock should go to Somethin S... May 22 2007, 09:10 AM
schwab why does this not surprise me.....
and the clerk ... May 22 2007, 09:29 AM
cmac so a person who innocently sells a product in a st... May 22 2007, 10:54 AM
Psykopath I'm considering going to a City Council meetin... May 22 2007, 12:07 PM
JRockTTU QUOTE (Psykopath @ May 22 2007, 01:07 PM)... May 22 2007, 12:12 PM
Psykopath QUOTE (JRockTTU @ May 22 2007, 01:12 PM) ... May 22 2007, 12:14 PM
JRockTTU QUOTE (Psykopath @ May 22 2007, 01:14 PM)... May 22 2007, 12:16 PM
schwab it wont make a difference, they will just sasy tha... May 22 2007, 12:32 PM
James Yeah. Yall are barking up the wrong tree. City c... May 22 2007, 12:43 PM
kcroxyoursox QUOTE (James @ May 22 2007, 01:43 PM) Yea... May 22 2007, 08:20 PM
James Oh yeah, and I'm not sure why or how they... May 22 2007, 12:52 PM
James That's what I just said? May 22 2007, 01:38 PM
THECHICKEN QUOTE (James @ May 22 2007, 02:38 PM) Tha... May 22 2007, 01:48 PM
zetec funny story: When I was hit by a suburban my fresh... May 22 2007, 01:42 PM
JRockTTU QUOTE (zetec @ May 22 2007, 02:42 PM) fun... May 22 2007, 04:45 PM
zetec nah, this was supposedly off of university WAAAAY ... May 22 2007, 04:55 PM
Divergent Reality same crap has happened to a shop in austin a few t... May 22 2007, 05:06 PM
Renegadepeon It's only a matter of time before they start a... May 22 2007, 06:50 PM
James I highly doubt that this was their top priority bu... May 22 2007, 08:58 PM
Psykopath QUOTE (James @ May 22 2007, 09:58 PM) I h... May 22 2007, 09:48 PM
JRockTTU QUOTE (Psykopath @ May 22 2007, 10:48 PM)... May 22 2007, 10:49 PM
James QUOTE (Psykopath @ May 22 2007, 10:48 PM)... May 23 2007, 06:41 AM
JRockTTU QUOTE (James @ May 23 2007, 07:41 AM) Fou... May 23 2007, 10:40 AM
Divergent Reality QUOTE (JRockTTU @ May 23 2007, 11:40 AM) ... May 23 2007, 12:10 PM
chook I love the shitty english, six sexual item May 22 2007, 10:45 PM
impala454 yay lets again immediately blame Christians. it m... May 22 2007, 10:46 PM
Psykopath QUOTE (impala454 @ May 22 2007, 11:46 PM)... May 22 2007, 11:59 PM
impala454 QUOTE (Psykopath @ May 23 2007, 12:59 AM)... May 23 2007, 10:06 AM
impala454 oh I never said it was a good use of cops, just sa... May 23 2007, 12:29 PM
cmac they had to spend time planning the raids.
so 20-4... May 23 2007, 12:32 PM
Psykopath QUOTE (cmac @ May 23 2007, 01:32 PM) they... May 23 2007, 12:42 PM
TinEqualWin Impala, you're forgetting all the wasted tax-p... May 23 2007, 01:05 PM
impala454 hundreds of thousands of dollars? I don't thi... May 23 2007, 01:33 PM
Dr. Gonzo Why did the clerk get arrested but not the owner? ... May 23 2007, 03:03 PM
zetec QUOTE (impala454 @ May 23 2007, 01:29 PM)... May 23 2007, 03:19 PM
James LOL May 23 2007, 03:21 PM
JRockTTU QUOTE (TinEqualWin @ May 23 2007, 02:05 P... May 23 2007, 04:56 PM
zetec speaking of police resources, that's one thing... May 23 2007, 05:19 PM
jwttu QUOTE (zetec @ May 23 2007, 06:19 PM) spe... May 23 2007, 05:35 PM
James I honestly doubt LPD's target recruitment pool... May 23 2007, 05:35 PM
JRockTTU Yeah, that was another point I was going to bring ... May 23 2007, 06:29 PM
jwttu QUOTE (JRockTTU @ May 23 2007, 07:29 PM) ... May 23 2007, 06:58 PM
lamont's lament the lpd was advertising a lot at the beginning of ... May 23 2007, 09:05 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 02:16 PM |