u.s. invades iran Options

[GOB]

well, not yet, but probably before 2010.







http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070209/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/gates

SEVILLE, Spain - Serial numbers and markings on explosives used in Iraq provide "pretty good" evidence that Iran is providing either weapons or technology for militants there, Defense Secretary Robert Gates asserted Friday.

Offering some of the first public details of evidence the military has collected, Gates said, "I think there's some serial numbers, there may be some markings on some of the projectile fragments that we found," that point to Iran.

At the same time, however, he said he was somewhat surprised that recent raids by coalition and Iraqi forces in Iraq swept up some Iranians.

this is just the beginning of "evidence" the government is going to feed us until the american public is convinced that we need to attack.

[Psykopath]

If they saw us invading other countries in the region purely to "fuck them up" (aren't you the brilliant little diplomat!) then you bet your ass they'd form at least a loose coalition with the common goal of ending the American threat...It's a coalition that wouldn't last long beyond stopping the American advance, but it'd be there.

So, Chuck (Impala): You seriously want another war? Are you willing to enlist instead of just cheering on the front lines from your recliner via clips from Fox News?

[impala454]

So, Chuck (Impala): You seriously want another war?

oh no, never said I wanted war, but when another country is aiding killing our troops we can't sit back and let em.

[pebkac]

oh no, never said I wanted war, but when another country is aiding killing our troops we can't sit back and let em.

Which there's no clear evidence of.

Methinks the Bush administration is using Iran as a scapegoat for its problems in Iraq.

This post has been edited by pebkac: Feb 13 2007, 10:06 AM