Oct 25 2006, 08:59 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 25 2006, 10:21 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Prize? Group: Members Posts: 302 Joined: 16-October 06 Member No.: 343 |
Um, so i would be uneducated to think that the system can be perfected and thus much more efficient than paper?
Or would it just be uneductated to think RIGHT NOW they aren't as safe as paper ballots? (i agree with the paper being more secure right now... save those damn hanging chads and confusingly voting for buchanen) |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2006, 10:24 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
Um, so i would be uneducated to think that the system can be perfected and thus much more efficient than paper? Or would it just be uneductated to think RIGHT NOW they aren't as safe as paper ballots? Yes, you would be uneducated to think the system can be perfected. Nothing is perfect, especially in the software world. Compare this to to copy protection... people will always find a way to break it. New vulnerabilities are discovered every day in all sorts of software products. Sign up for bugtrak, securityfocus, or CERT. Anyone who thinks software can be perfected is a complete idiot. Anyone with any basic software engineering experience or who has ever taken a softare engineering class knows this. They tell you this on the first day in software engineering 101. |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2006, 10:49 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Prize? Group: Members Posts: 302 Joined: 16-October 06 Member No.: 343 |
Yes, you would be uneducated to think the system can be perfected. Nothing is perfect, especially in the software world. Compare this to to copy protection... people will always find a way to break it. New vulnerabilities are discovered every day in all sorts of software products. Sign up for bugtrak, securityfocus, or CERT. Anyone who thinks software can be perfected is a complete idiot. Anyone with any basic software engineering experience or who has ever taken a softare engineering class knows this. They tell you this on the first day in software engineering 101. Maybe "perfected" was the wrong word.... but im pretty sure i didn't mean perfecting SOFTWARE. I more meant making the ability to cheat the system much harder than a percievable risk to it actually happening. Maybe more checks and balances, lower tech, securtiy measures at the booths, double checks, codes for each citizen while using so it is harder to duplicate a mass number of votes... Im not talking perfecting anything (because paper ballots can't be perfected) but more just making it hard enough on multiple levels so that paper is just as likely to be abused. Some how i doubt paper is our only choice ever... but then again i AM uneducated on future abilities of electronic voting... |
|
|
|
Overlord quebec bans electronic voting Oct 25 2006, 08:59 PM
lamont's lament hey, while we're at it, let's get rid of a... Oct 25 2006, 09:23 PM
Overlord QUOTE (lamont's lament @ Oct 25 2006, 10... Oct 25 2006, 09:27 PM
lamont's lament is hacking those machines easier than "losing... Oct 25 2006, 09:34 PM
Overlord QUOTE (lamont's lament @ Oct 25 2006, 10... Oct 25 2006, 09:40 PM
lamont's lament meh, to each his own. if you support creating mor... Oct 25 2006, 10:01 PM
Divergent Reality maybe talk to the vegas slot machine makers.
see ... Oct 25 2006, 11:12 PM
impala454 shit i guess we should go back to paper checks and... Oct 26 2006, 12:37 AM
Overlord technology isn't the answer for everything
im... Oct 26 2006, 06:23 AM
impala454 i understand where you're coming from, corrupt... Oct 26 2006, 08:56 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th August 2026 - 02:01 PM |