IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


> Staying the course
Rocky
post Oct 23 2006, 12:22 AM
Post #1


ROCKPACALYPSE NOW


Group: Members
Posts: 1,519
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 13



total fark link, but still amusing

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/22/bush-s...aIsScrewed=true


COMMENCE BITCHING BACK AND FORTH !


--------------------
QUOTE (Lance)
now we have some dude from argentina wondering how to fuck dogmeat
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
woody
post Oct 23 2006, 01:52 PM
Post #2





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 23 2006, 08:36 AM) *
Impala, the democrats are Bush's opposition party. They criticise everything Bush does because it's their job. Just like the Republicans criticise everything the Democrats do.



And that's what's wrong with todays politics

too much bitching about each other 7 nothing getting done


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GOB
post Oct 23 2006, 02:11 PM
Post #3


monogamous gays & stem cells


Group: Members
Posts: 3,789
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 8



QUOTE (woody @ Oct 23 2006, 02:52 PM) *
And that's what's wrong with todays politics

too much bitching about each other 7 nothing getting done



we're turning into british parliment
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Fanatic
post Oct 23 2006, 05:52 PM
Post #4


Do they ignore parts of reality?


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,935
Joined: 23-February 06
From: South Overton!!!
Member No.: 46



QUOTE (lamont's lament @ Oct 23 2006, 03:11 PM) *
we're turning into british parliment



The british parliament get PLENTY of done, in fact more then the US, espcially if one party has a big majority. That is because party loyalty in england is MUCH greater then the US. Members of parliament rarely go against the party, and if they do, they may not be nominated next term and have to go Independent. That is the nature of british parliament. If we had that loyalty it would just be scary. Parties would have MUCH amounts of control on who was elected and not the people.


--------------------
A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?

-Philip K. Dick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chook
post Oct 23 2006, 10:42 PM
Post #5


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



QUOTE (Dr. Gonzo @ Oct 23 2006, 06:52 PM) *
The british parliament get PLENTY of done, in fact more then the US, espcially if one party has a big majority. That is because party loyalty in england is MUCH greater then the US. Members of parliament rarely go against the party, and if they do, they may not be nominated next term and have to go Independent. That is the nature of british parliament. If we had that loyalty it would just be scary. Parties would have MUCH amounts of control on who was elected and not the people.

You vote for the party and not the member. The party chooses the members to put in based on how many seats they are allocated.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th August 2026 - 02:44 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com