avatars and YOU, common sense people Options

[kcroxyoursox]

ok for real can we use some common sense about our avatars? people who browse at work are warned not to view the lrar thread because nsfw stuff is safe in there. but what good does that restriction do if nsfw avatars are allowed in sfw threads?

i figured this would be common sense but apparently...

[Guest_CANNONBALL_*]

the reason i started the thread in the first place was because i thought after the first round of avatar trouble that everyone got involved in concerning brandon, that the rules were made clear about nsfw avatars.

obviously people who still refrain from these rules arent being courteous to others. why should i humor them with a please-and-thank-you attitude? the rules are if its nsfw dont post it. not if its nsfw outside a 2 foot radius of personal space. and heres the kicker - if its questionable whether its nsfw or if someone else can see it and tell what it is, then dont post it. there are MILLIONS of images on the internet that you can use to be equally annoying/rebellious/funny that are sfw. bottom line is, you KNOW when something is sfw or nsfw. choosing to follow through anyway just shows how much of a badass you think you are.

im done arguing about dogmeat. he changed it and thats fine and i said thank you. but for everyone else who wants to bitch, lets bitch about changing the rules to include the parameters when nsfw avatars are okay in sfw threads. because obviously thats what the real issue is here.

too logical.

you are going to make techsans.net implode with that post.