Apr 15 2009, 03:55 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 706 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Lubbock, TX Member No.: 20 |
United gets strict on ‘seatmates of size’
QUOTE Effective today, United Airlines has a new official policy that affects “seatmates of size” and those passengers seated near them.
The airline’s policy — posted on United's Web site — states that if a passenger cannot fit into a single seat, buckle their seatbelt with an additional seatbelt extension, or put the seat’s armrest down, the airline will ask that passenger to pay for an extra seat or stay behind. Spokesperson Robin Urbanski Janikowski, meanwhile, said the airline will first attempt to take measures to avoid the extra charge. “If there is another seat on the airplane that is next to an empty seat, we will re-accommodate our guest in that seat and there is no charge,” she wrote in an e-mail message. Until the company's posted policy reflects Urbanski Janikowski's message, passengers — large and small — should consider printing and carrying both the policy and the spokesperson's statements with them when they go to the airport. The airline's policy applies to tickets purchased on or after March 4, 2009, for travel on or after today, April 15. Citing “the comfort and well-being of all customers aboard United flights,” the policy states passengers meeting “one or more of these criteria” must either purchase a ticket for an additional seat or purchase an upgrade to a cabin with larger seats. A customer who falls into any of these categories who decides not to upgrade or purchase a second seat may be denied boarding. While Southwest and other airlines have had similar policies on their books for some time, not all airlines are as cut-and-dry about how they enforce those policies when a passenger needs some extra space. American Airlines, for example, reserves the right to charge passengers for a second ticket, but does so only if it can find no other solution, such as re-seating the passenger next to an empty seat at no extra charge. “If a flight is not full, our flight attendants may be able to change passenger seat assignments in order to more comfortably accommodate all passengers,” said American spokesperson Andrea Huguely. Second seat, same fare? According to United’s new policy, if it is determined that a passenger is required to purchase an additional seat, then “the fare for that seat will be the same as the fare paid for the original seat ... even if the additional ticket is purchased on the day of departure, when fares are normally higher.” However, if there are no additional seats open or if an upgraded seat is not available, then the passenger will have to wait until the next flight or until a flight with adequate seating become available. If no seats are available or if a passenger decides not to fly, then United will refund the price of the ticket without penalties. One upside of the new policy? Those purchasing a second seat will gain that extra baggage allowance. However, because carry-on baggage policies are determined by the Transportation Security Administration, not the airline, the per-passenger carry-on restrictions remain the same no matter how many seats a single passenger ends up occupying. -------------------- Beers that I have had, updated July 5th, 2009: 1,548
My Beer List "Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel" - Samuel Johnson "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ" - Mahatma Gandhi |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 16 2009, 05:22 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() GORILLA FLUFFER Group: Agents Posts: 7,711 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 50 |
i understand what dauss is saying, but i agree more with impala. the article is either very poorly written, or the policy will be completely inaffective
-------------------- |
|
|
|
dauss Get ready to pay fatties!!! Apr 15 2009, 03:55 PM
Psykopath Good policy change. Apr 15 2009, 04:01 PM
impala454 Ok, I'll concede that it makes sense for the m... Apr 15 2009, 07:14 PM
dauss QUOTE (impala454 @ Apr 15 2009, 07:14 PM)... Apr 15 2009, 07:35 PM
impala454 QUOTE (dauss @ Apr 15 2009, 08:35 PM) Rea... Apr 15 2009, 07:50 PM
chook That part does have a point. I had to sit next to... Apr 15 2009, 07:40 PM
impala454 QUOTE (chook @ Apr 15 2009, 08:40 PM) Tha... Apr 15 2009, 07:51 PM
chook QUOTE (impala454 @ Apr 15 2009, 08:51 PM)... Apr 16 2009, 12:32 AM
Oasis Who would have guessed, the same two people who ha... Apr 16 2009, 05:42 PM
FORSAKENR320 QUOTE (Oasis @ Apr 16 2009, 06:42 PM) Who... Apr 16 2009, 05:46 PM
impala454 QUOTE (Oasis @ Apr 16 2009, 06:42 PM) Who... Apr 16 2009, 09:44 PM
chook QUOTE (impala454 @ Apr 16 2009, 09:44 PM)... Apr 17 2009, 01:11 AM
FORSAKENR320 i don't understand what this is supposed to be... Apr 16 2009, 05:45 PM
pysex it's bad enough to have to fly anyway and you ... Apr 16 2009, 08:59 PM
The Fanatic I agree with the policy. Americans need to lose we... Apr 30 2009, 12:37 AM
FORSAKENR320 QUOTE (The Fanatic @ Apr 30 2009, 01:37 A... May 1 2009, 05:44 AM
The Fanatic QUOTE (FORSAKENR320 @ May 1 2009, 06:44 A... May 1 2009, 11:50 PM
blaarg Good point Impala -- as it's presently worded ... May 1 2009, 06:42 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th June 2026 - 07:22 AM |