avatars and YOU, common sense people Options

[kcroxyoursox]

ok for real can we use some common sense about our avatars? people who browse at work are warned not to view the lrar thread because nsfw stuff is safe in there. but what good does that restriction do if nsfw avatars are allowed in sfw threads?

i figured this would be common sense but apparently...

[kcroxyoursox]

I can't speak for the other mods, but I don't consider something NSFW if you have to look at the image close up or for a fair amount of time to see that it's depicting sex or what have you. Brandon has had at least one avatar that would be considered NSFW if I didn't use that limiting criterion... same with a couple of sigs.

And I don't see anybody complaining about Rocky's avatar, when it's just as NSFW as Dogmeat's was.

We're trying to be consistent without ruling with a heavy hand.

its a moot point to argue about it now (thank you dm) but am i the only one who didnt need a magnifying glass or twenty minutes to see what it was?

and on a side note, christine when you said earlier the mods had already discussed it, was that done on the boards somewhere that we can see? if there is reasoning behind something that i could have read myself, i would have liked to have read it and then based what i said off of that (or maybe not said anything if i could have seen the reasoning and it made sense)