Mar 3 2009, 08:30 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6290967.html
Great, so now we're going to rely on the Russians. Hell they're probably helping Iran build missles. I swear a nuke is going to fall somewhere while Obama is president. 75% it's Israel 20% it's us 5% it's some other euro country |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 4 2009, 02:14 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,302 Joined: 20-February 07 Member No.: 721 |
Ok so heres my question, would you be more in favor of having MAD against a russian government and no missle defense (which is a joke anyway) with russians helping to prevent and islamic country like Iran from getting a nuke, or would you rather have a missle defense grid and Iran having the Bomb because Russia continued to ignore the embargo?
Personally, i think MAD makes missle defenses useless (can't stop them all), and Russia and america against Iran would help shut them down. Of course russia could still give aid, but we could still put missles back. Just assuming a deal like that worked. Which would you be more in favor of? -------------------- |
|
|
|
impala454 Obama caves to Russians on missle shield Mar 3 2009, 08:30 AM
THECHICKEN QUOTE (impala454 @ Mar 3 2009, 08:30 AM) ... Mar 3 2009, 09:31 AM
FORSAKENR320 i'm in favor of the choice most likely to brin... Mar 4 2009, 07:38 AM
chook Those anti-icbm missiles work, just not enough of ... Mar 4 2009, 10:39 AM
THECHICKEN QUOTE (chook @ Mar 4 2009, 10:39 AM) Thos... Mar 4 2009, 11:17 AM
impala454 supposedly we have space based missle defenses too... Mar 4 2009, 12:02 PM
THECHICKEN Meh, if we can get the benefit of getting Russia t... Mar 4 2009, 03:34 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 05:30 AM |