![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 ![]() |
And I disagree. I do not think that women who are pregnant or have small children should be drafted, but otherwise I think they are capable of serving. I acknowledge that, generally speaking, women are physically weaker than men, but if they can pass the same physical tests as a man, they should be able to serve in the same positions. The same goes for high-stress positions and psychological screenings.
Assuming that men and women are held to the same standards, I don't see why it should be the man's job to fight wars while the women hold down the fort at home. -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 ![]() |
And I disagree. I do not think that women who are pregnant or have small children should be drafted, but otherwise I think they are capable of serving. I acknowledge that, generally speaking, women are physically weaker than men, but if they can pass the same physical tests as a man, they should be able to serve in the same positions. The same goes for high-stress positions and psychological screenings. "IF THEY CAN PASS THE SAME PHYSICAL TESTS AS A MAN".... you just said it yourself. Women who are not able to pass the same tests as men should not be eligible. Not many women can; therefore, a drafting of women is pointless.
Assuming that men and women are held to the same standards, I don't see why it should be the man's job to fight wars while the women hold down the fort at home. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th September 2025 - 09:33 AM |