ohio sues e-voting company diebold Options

[Seeker]

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080...y-machines.html

cue all the republican schlong suckers on here to ramble on about how great electronic closed-source paperless voting and diebold is

[Seeker]

you're totally missing the point

electronic voting machines make it possible for that HUMAN to change votes on a much WIDER/LARGER scale... instead of some local idiot working for a county and burning a box of votes we're talking about any average joe off the street (who doesn't even work at the polling location) can walk in and tamper with the machine by inserting a malicious memory card, not to mention a hacker can hack into the main polling station and change the votes from every county in the state.

i'm not saying optical scanning machines are tamper-proof but they have a whole hell of a lot less fail-points and vulnerabilities, and the fraud is usually locally-contained

which would you rather have now? get the point dipshit?

hey dumbass... i've never heard of any optical voting machine companies being sued for unreliable voting systems... but oh wait... an electronic voting machine company is being sued by a state... i wonder why? hahaha, dude you're a fucking tool

From article:

Brunner has advocated reverting to a system of optically-scanned paper ballots

HAHAHA! TOOL!