Enslave the Poor Options

[Dogmeat]

It's really dawned on me that the poor, be they white, black, mexican, eskimo, french, who or whatever ..

Essentially contribute nothing to society.

They're lazy, they have bad attitudes, they aren't motivated, and generally speaking are just leeches on the rest of us who are actually attempting to be productive in life.

The problem with slavery in the past is that it targeted people by race, relegion or other politically incorrect classifications.

I propose that with the last century of what I'll call "Civil Rights Development" in mind, we re-instate slavery however we only enslave those who are jobless.

In essense, we can find everyone a job and then provide them with healthcare, etc, if they are enslaved.

It would be bad business for us to not take care of our slaves, however, the price for us taking care of them will be their slavery.

IE, they will work when, where, and how we tell them to work.

Eventually, once they've worked long and hard enough and are able to support themselves, they will be free of slavery, and than can own their own slaves.

I mean think about it ..

The poor in the ghettos, trailer parks, igloos, whatever... are poor, dejected, on drugs, etc ... they hate where they are, yet somehow, they refuse to leave.

I say we make em leave the shitholes they live in. If they won't get out on their own, we'll make them, enslave them, and force them to better themselves..

All the while contributing to the economy ... we'll have a society of productive people who aren't lazy anymore.

Sound good? I think so.

Dogmeat for President!

[Testm0nkey]

impala wtf. your scenario just doesnt happen. people in denmark and no one is suggesting that people go to school for something but are told they are going to be something else. whered you get that idea. and no hillary and people are not trying to limit the number of kids people can have, where they can live and where they go to school. thats not democratic socialism

[impala454]

impala wtf. your scenario just doesnt happen. people in denmark and no one is suggesting that people go to school for something but are told they are going to be something else. whered you get that idea. and no hillary and people are not trying to limit the number of kids people can have, where they can live and where they go to school. thats not democratic socialism

I didn't say Hillary was going to limit the number of kids you can have. But that kind of control (along w/the other things I mentioned) does occur in socialist countries. It bothers me that people like Hillary (& many other democrats) exhibit a desire for more control over our everyday lives.

[Testm0nkey]

I didn't say Hillary was going to limit the number of kids you can have. But that kind of control (along w/the other things I mentioned) does occur in socialist countries. It bothers me that people like Hillary (& many other democrats) exhibit a desire for more control over our everyday lives.

by socialist countries you mean China? thats communism.

if americans needs more control by a good honest government to stop being idiotic im all for it

[impala454]

by socialist countries you mean China? thats communism.

newsflash: Communism is a form of socialism. and before you come back with it (and I know you would) no, I did not just say socialism = communism. note the difference.

if americans needs more control by a good honest government to stop being idiotic im all for it

how would controlling citizens more make less idiots??

[Inferia]

newsflash: Communism is a form of socialism. and before you come back with it (and I know you would) no, I did not just say socialism = communism. note the difference.
how would controlling citizens more make less idiots??

Actually, I think communism refers to a political system, whereas socialism refers to an economic system. Though most of the time the two are intertwined, but one can exist with out the other.