IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


> A Democrat ..r--r---r----rig an election? NO! NEVER!
Dogmeat
post Feb 17 2008, 02:40 PM
Post #1


DEATH TO ....something?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,618
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Parker, CO
Member No.: 55



http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/superde...2/17/73334.html

<awaits the hippi defense of the democrats>


anyways, while you're all stumbeling around trying to defend this, which is basically an admission that she WOULD rig the election if she could to get elected...


well nevermind that's all that needs to be said.

heh smile.gif


--------------------
I r Ur Gawd!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
pebkac
post Feb 17 2008, 09:12 PM
Post #2


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Feb 17 2008, 02:40 PM) *
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/superde...2/17/73334.html

<awaits the hippi defense of the democrats>
anyways, while you're all stumbeling around trying to defend this, which is basically an admission that she WOULD rig the election if she could to get elected...
well nevermind that's all that needs to be said.

heh smile.gif


QUOTE
Trailing Obama in the nomination race after losing eight straight contests to the Illinois senator, Clinton and her advisers suggested hundreds of "superdelegates" -- party activists and elected lawmakers attending the Democratic convention in August -- were not bound by the results of voting in their states, US media reported.


I fail to see how Hillary stating the truth means her wanting to rig the election.


QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Feb 17 2008, 04:07 PM) *
Well, Superdelegates can and will do whatever the fuck they want. I don't like it, but that's the way it is. Many will, however, vote with their state. Their jobs may hinge on it.

I do, however, strongly disagree that delegates from Florida and Michigan should count. I disagree with the Dem party stripping of their delegates, but candidates got their names removed from the ballots, declined to campaign there, etc. BASED on that knowledge. To restore their delegates after the fact would be profoundly unfair.


I would argue that it's more unfair to deprive millions of people of their votes in the election.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Feb 17 2008, 10:48 PM
Post #3





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (pebkac @ Feb 17 2008, 09:12 PM) *
I fail to see how Hillary stating the truth means her wanting to rig the election.
I would argue that it's more unfair to deprive millions of people of their votes in the election.

They'd have to re-vote. I'm pretty sure Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan (maybe Florida too). It's a little dumb that they got stripped of their delegates, but the state parties KNEW that when they set the dates for their primaries.


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th August 2026 - 06:44 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com