![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 ![]() |
http://www.newsmax.com/politics/campaign_r...2/03/69711.html
QUOTE WASHINGTON -- Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans. So the truth [that everyone has already known] comes out! Prime example of her and her socialist agenda. Excuse me bitch, garnish my wages to pay for health care for a crack addicts? I don't think so. -------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 ![]() |
They don't even get that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMTALA#Cost_p...es_on_hospitals Since the hospitals are usually funded by some government entity, this means higher taxes for that government entity. Either that or they're paid for in the form of passing those costs on to people who do have insurance or assistance from a government program. Either way you look at it, it results in higher healthcare costs. And yes, if you do have insurance, you are paying for these people whether you like it or not. Damn socialized medicine. Your link is about healthcare providers. I.e. doctors & their practices. Not hospitals. If you want to look at it that way, then you can say that someone who gets in a wreck costs me tax dollars. You can say that someone who throws gum out the window costs me tax dollars. But any entity that takes tax deductions does not directly result in my taxes increasing. Yes large portions of medical bills go unpaid, but those unpaid bills are tax deductible. Nowhere in your link does it say otherwise. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th September 2025 - 04:36 AM |