IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


> norquist drafting constitutional amendment to prevent family political dynasties
Seeker
post Nov 12 2007, 02:39 PM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



very needed in IMO, we don't need 30 years of bushes and clintons, or any other family for that matter

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Constitution...event_1111.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 14)
FORSAKENR320
post Nov 12 2007, 02:49 PM
Post #2


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



not gonna read it, but i agree. in general, i hate career politicians


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Psykopath
post Nov 12 2007, 02:50 PM
Post #3


Why so serious?


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 5,286
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Fate, TX
Member No.: 4



I would say this is a good thing.

It seems to prevent immediate succession of family members into the same office, something that seems more monarchical that democratic anyway.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Nov 12 2007, 03:08 PM
Post #4





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



So he's drafting an amendment to prevent a situation that has thus far NEVER occurred in American history? Brilliant.


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Psykopath
post Nov 12 2007, 03:15 PM
Post #5


Why so serious?


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 5,286
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Fate, TX
Member No.: 4



QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Nov 12 2007, 03:08 PM) *
So he's drafting an amendment to prevent a situation that has thus far NEVER occurred in American history? Brilliant.


POLICY OF PREEMPTION

heh


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Nov 12 2007, 03:20 PM
Post #6





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



I'm just saying... like Lance's comments about the Bushes and Clintons... this would do nothing to remedy that.

Personally I think it's just a political stunt, capitalizing on people's fears of "dynasties".

This post has been edited by Spectatrix: Nov 12 2007, 03:22 PM


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
THECHICKEN
post Nov 12 2007, 07:22 PM
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 20-February 07
Member No.: 721



We are a nation of voting into office people who would best represent us (in theory lol) and then want a constitutional amendment that would preclude certain people from being elected by the people....

seems odd and against the idea of our country. The Constitution already lays out how people get ELECTED, no real need for amendment.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Nov 12 2007, 08:09 PM
Post #8





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



i don't think family members should be "punished" for being in a family line of those in office.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Nov 12 2007, 08:23 PM
Post #9





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



this a democratic republic, not a monarchy

if the founding fathers knew had a bush, clinton, bush, and possibly another clinton they'd be rolling in their graves

because of the stupidity of the american people, 95% are retarded, this amendment is needed
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
THECHICKEN
post Nov 12 2007, 08:33 PM
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 20-February 07
Member No.: 721



QUOTE (Watchman @ Nov 12 2007, 08:23 PM) *
this a democratic republic, not a monarchy

if the founding fathers knew had a bush, clinton, bush, and possibly another clinton they'd be rolling in their graves

because of the stupidity of the american people, 95% are retarded, this amendment is needed

Oh, so they were turning in there graves over President john adams, and 6th president, his son, John Quincy Adams? Funny how they were still ALIVE when it happened.

Stop thinking that just because family gets elected its not democracy. Idiots may get elected because of it, but you need to look at the definition of monarchy before you start making ridiculous propaganda.

Oh, William Henery Harrison, and his grandson Benjamin Harrison.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Fanatic
post Nov 12 2007, 10:49 PM
Post #11


Do they ignore parts of reality?


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,935
Joined: 23-February 06
From: South Overton!!!
Member No.: 46



Teddy Roosevelt

and

FDR

This amendment is unnecessary. Of course, it would be ideal not to elect members of the same family over and over again. However, if the American people choose to elect certain members of the same family then no one should interfere.


--------------------
A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?

-Philip K. Dick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Nov 12 2007, 10:55 PM
Post #12





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (Dr. Gonzo @ Nov 12 2007, 10:49 PM) *
Teddy Roosevelt

and

FDR

This amendment is unnecessary. Of course, it would be ideal not to elect members of the same family over and over again. However, if the American people choose to elect certain members of the same family then no one should interfere.

5th cousins. Somehow I doubt the amendment would apply to such distant relatives. But I agree nonetheless.

Bush has fucked things up so badly that I doubt any member of his family would have even a chance of getting elected, at least anytime soon. 30 years from now, though, who knows?


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Nov 13 2007, 01:33 PM
Post #13


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



I don't really see anything wrong with dynasties in and of themselves. The problem is that Americans are suckers for brand names. Fortunately, there's a lot of other ways to build a "brand name" in American politics.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
prefix
post Nov 13 2007, 04:29 PM
Post #14





Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 59



QUOTE (Watchman @ Nov 12 2007, 08:23 PM) *
this a democratic republic, not a monarchy

if the founding fathers knew had a bush, clinton, bush, and possibly another clinton they'd be rolling in their graves

because of the stupidity of the american people, 95% are retarded, this amendment is needed


Oh do you mean like John Adams and John Quincy Adams? Yea, those founding fathers would be rolling around alright.

On another note, are you just retarded or do you seriously believe the shit that you say? Seems to me that everything that comes out of your mouth is just unresearched garbage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Nov 13 2007, 05:11 PM
Post #15





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



Wow, Wiki's a great resource. Seems like most of the presidential families are related to each other somehow.

Direct Descent
  • John Adams and John Quincy Adams (father and son)
  • William Harrison and Benjamin Harrison (grandfather and grandson)
  • George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush (father and son)
Other
  • Zachary Taylor: second cousin of James Madison
  • Millard Fillmore: fourth cousin three times removed of John Adams, fifth cousin twice removed of John Quincy Adams
  • Ulysses Grant: seventh cousin of Millard Fillmore
  • Grover Cleveland: fifth cousin once removed of Millard Fillmore, sixth cousin once removed of Ulysses Grant, fifth cousin once removed of Rutherford Hayes
  • Benjamin Harrison: fifth cousin once removed of John Tyler (his grandfather, President William Harrison, was a fourth cousin once removed of Tyler)
  • Theodore Roosevelt: third cousin three times removed of Martin Van Buren
  • William Taft: fourth cousin five times removed of John Adams, fifth cousin four times removed of John Quincy Adams, sixth cousin once removed of Millard Fillmore, eighth cousin once removed of Rutherford Hayes, fifth cousin once removed of James Garfield, sixth cousin once removed of Grover Cleveland, seventh cousin of Benjamin Harrison
  • Warren Harding: fifth cousin twice removed of Millard Fillmore, eighth cousin twice removed of William Taft
  • Calvin Coolidge: third cousin six times removed of John Adams, fourth cousin five times removed of John Quincy Adams, sixth cousin four times removed of Millard Fillmore, sixth cousin four times removed of Franklin Pierce, seventh cousin twice removed of Ulysses Grant, sixth cousin twice removed of James Garfield, ninth cousin once removed of Benjamin Harrison, seventh cousin once removed of William Taft
  • Herbert Hoover: fifth cousin four times removed of Millard Fillmore, fourth cousin five times removed of Franklin Pierce, seventh cousin three times removed of James Garfield
  • Franklin Roosevelt: fourth cousin three times removed of John Quincy Adams, third cousin four times removed of Martin Van Buren, half fourth cousin three times removed of Zachary Taylor, seventh cousin once removed of Millard Fillmore, sixth cousin twice removed of Franklin Pierce, fourth cousin once removed of Ulysses Grant, sixth cousin once removed of Rutherford Hayes, half eighth cousin of Grover Cleveland, fifth cousin of Theodore Roosevelt (although his wife, Eleanor Roosevelt, was a niece of Theodore), sixth cousin twice removed of William Taft, seventh cousin once removed of Calvin Coolidge
  • Richard Nixon: eighth cousin three times removed of Rutherford Hayes, seventh cousin twice removed of William Taft, ninth cousin of Warren Harding, eighth cousin once removed of Calvin Coolidge, eighth cousin once removed of Franklin Roosevelt
  • Gerald Ford: fifth cousin five times removed of Millard Fillmore, seventh cousin four times removed of Abraham Lincoln, sixth cousin three times removed of Ulysses Grant, sixth cousin three times removed of Rutherford Hayes, seventh cousin three times removed of James Garfield, fifth cousin four times removed of Grover Cleveland, seventh cousin twice removed of William Taft, ninth cousin once removed of Warren Harding, eighth cousin once removed of Calvin Coolidge, eighth cousin once removed of Herbert Hoover, sixth cousin twice removed of Franklin Roosevelt, eighth cousin twice removed of Richard Nixon
  • Jimmy Carter: ninth cousin of Warren Harding, sixth cousin of Richard Nixon
  • George H. W. Bush: fourth cousin five times removed of Millard Fillmore, fifth cousin four times removed of Franklin Pierce, seventh cousin four times removed of Abraham Lincoln, sixth cousin five times removed of Ulysses Grant, sixth cousin three times removed of Rutherford Hayes, fourth cousin three times removed of James Garfield, seventh cousin twice removed of Grover Cleveland, seventh cousin three times removed of Theodore Roosevelt (also eighth cousin twice removed of Eleanor Roosevelt, a niece of Theodore), sixth cousin three times removed of William Taft, sixth cousin twice removed of Calvin Coolidge, tenth cousin of Herbert Hoover, sixth cousin three times removed of Franklin Roosevelt, ninth cousin four times removed of Richard Nixon, seventh cousin of Gerald Ford. Note that these relationships then also apply to George W. Bush, each an additional generation removed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unite...al_relationship


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th November 2026 - 05:27 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com