Jun 13 2007, 09:58 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,402 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...d=moreheadlines
Full transcript: http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articl...ng_wooing_media Video: http://uk.reuters.com/news/globalcoverage/newsmakerBlair He states that the media organizations go for 'impact' over validity: QUOTE "It is all that can distinguish, can rise above the clamor, can get noticed," he said. "Impact gives competitive edge. Of course the accuracy of a story counts. But it is secondary to impact." In that environment, he said, "something that is interesting is less powerful than something that makes you angry or shocked. . . . A problem is 'a crisis.' A setback is a policy 'in tatters.' A criticism, 'a savage attack.' " I'd have to say I agree with him. Very interesting speech and is a shining example of why I have been a Blair fan for a while. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 13 2007, 10:12 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,761 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Lubbock/Dubai Member No.: 57 |
media sucks, but what can you do
-------------------- bored...so i did this
http://beerlist.wetpaint.com/ |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 10:29 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
yep... nobody reports the plain, simple news anymore. I can insert my own adjectives and decide which news is important to me.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th March 2026 - 07:43 AM |