IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 10 Politically Incorrect Truths about Human Nature
Dogmeat
post Jul 7 2007, 09:36 PM
Post #1


DEATH TO ....something?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,618
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Parker, CO
Member No.: 55



I found this to be interesting....

http://www.psychologytoday.com/artic...622-000002.xml

However, this particular part of the article kinda fuels my thought about how sociologists are generally idiots:


Quote:
Relative to monogamy, polygyny creates greater fitness variance (the distance between the "winners" and the "losers" in the reproductive game) among males than among females because it allows a few males to monopolize all the females in the group. The greater fitness variance among males creates greater pressure for men to compete with each other for mates. Only big and tall males can win mating opportunities. Among pair-bonding species like humans, in which males and females stay together to raise their children, females also prefer to mate with big and tall males because they can provide better physical protection against predators and other males.

That is the biggest pile of horse shit I've ever heard. If that was the case I'd get laid so much it'd just be fucking retarded laugh.gif


--------------------
I r Ur Gawd!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Jul 7 2007, 09:59 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



I interpret the word big as muscular... not fat.

Ice burn.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dogmeat
post Jul 7 2007, 10:05 PM
Post #3


DEATH TO ....something?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,618
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Parker, CO
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (1up @ Jul 7 2007, 09:59 PM) *
I interpret the word big as muscular... not fat.

Ice burn.


Wow.


--------------------
I r Ur Gawd!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jul 7 2007, 10:32 PM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE
This page has moved
You've reached this page while trying to access a bookmark or click a link that is no longer active.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Testm0nkey
post Jul 7 2007, 10:42 PM
Post #5


CHEE CHEE


Group: Members
Posts: 5,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: trapped in the hoezone layer
Member No.: 39



women when on their periods are more prone to seek out or evaluate macho, big tall stereotype men as attractive. but when not on their periods women value sensitivity, caring, inner strength and companionship

women want to get their breed on when in heat with meat heads. when its important and in the long run they want to be with serious dudes

look up the study if you care for a source

but times are changing. women dont need physical protection anymore. they need what is also related to evolution, security, companionship and trust. what good is a man to a breeding women if hes going to knock her up and not help her out when shes pregnant (in the past evolutionary sense). a pregnant woman is pretty defenseless


--------------------
Little monkeys making money
Naked monkey looking funny
Mighty males are strong and free
Female monkey, not so lucky
Rocking monkeys, funky monkeys
Monkeys sticking other monkeys
Monkeys wrong or monkeys right
Mostly flexing monkey might
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dogmeat
post Jul 7 2007, 11:28 PM
Post #6


DEATH TO ....something?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,618
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Parker, CO
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (Testm0nkey @ Jul 7 2007, 10:42 PM) *
women when on their periods are more prone to seek out or evaluate macho, big tall stereotype men as attractive. but when not on their periods women value sensitivity, caring, inner strength and companionship

women want to get their breed on when in heat with meat heads. when its important and in the long run they want to be with serious dudes

look up the study if you care for a source

but times are changing. women dont need physical protection anymore. they need what is also related to evolution, security, companionship and trust. what good is a man to a breeding women if hes going to knock her up and not help her out when shes pregnant (in the past evolutionary sense). a pregnant woman is pretty defenseless



yeuh dey duz cuz imma beat dey asses!

laugh.gif


--------------------
I r Ur Gawd!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jul 7 2007, 11:58 PM
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



someone wanna quote the thing? I still get "this page has moved" when I click the link.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rocky
post Jul 8 2007, 09:13 AM
Post #8


ROCKPACALYPSE NOW


Group: Members
Posts: 1,519
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 13



real link :

http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pt...622-000002.html


--------------------
QUOTE (Lance)
now we have some dude from argentina wondering how to fuck dogmeat
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Timbo
post Jul 10 2007, 12:24 AM
Post #9


Italian. Yes.


Group: Members
Posts: 767
Joined: 22-February 06
From: -
Member No.: 18



This is so old hat.

Evolutionary Psychology. IssMahBaby;_;


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 11:46 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com