Post your conspiracy theories Options

[Billy]

I think if it's not too outlandish to claim the government destroyed their own trade towers to invade Iraq which was housing alien super troopers designed to eliminate the human race, then it's not too far off to claim lance hacked his own board to force everyone to donate for an upgrade.

Yeah that's right lance. Your conspiracy has been DISCOVERED!

[impala454]

ouch... lance = pwnd

[Seeker]

Actually, the conspiracy was to fake a hacking so Billy would mention it, and then I'd have an excuse to ban him.

[Dogmeat]

Actually, the conspiracy was to fake a hacking so Billy would mention it, and then I'd have an excuse to ban him.

Yeah but if you did that they'd know you were onto him and they'd come plant a bugging device on your toothbrush or some shit because they knew you were in cahoots with vatan, and that was really a front for some weird sort of financial guru cryptographical snare device an underground orthadox jew group designed to catch pro lebanon west texans for fear they would protest out of a "free speech zone" at texas tech and cause a riot

[pysex]

Yeah but if you did that they'd know you were onto him and they'd come plant a bugging device on your toothbrush or some shit because they knew you were in cahoots with vatan, and that was really a front for some weird sort of financial guru cryptographical snare device an underground orthadox jew group designed to catch pro lebanon west texans for fear they would protest out of a "free speech zone" at texas tech and cause a riot

wait what?

[pebkac]

Yeah but if you did that they'd know you were onto him and they'd come plant a bugging device on your toothbrush or some shit because they knew you were in cahoots with vatan, and that was really a front for some weird sort of financial guru cryptographical snare device an underground orthadox jew group designed to catch pro lebanon west texans for fear they would protest out of a "free speech zone" at texas tech and cause a riot

The Transcendental Deduction, that is to say, is by its very nature contradictory. The architectonic of human reason has lying before it, still, the objects in space and time. The fact is evident, even apodictically evident, that I have the reflection that the phenomenological epoche is given continuously as an objective unity in a multi-form and changeable multiplicity of experiences, which belong determinately to it. Multiplicities of what is itself given denote the universal primal phenomena of experiences. Our a priori knowledge constitutes the whole content for the objects in space and time, and our judgements have nothing to do with the phenomena. It is plain that noematic descriptions can be see as full proof that, in spite of the continual experiencedness of philosophy, a non-being of transcendental subjectivity is possible. The Categories, in respect of the intelligible character, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the Ideal of human reason, they exclude the possibility of a posteriori principles, yet the Antinomies are the clue to the discovery of, in particular, the Antinomies. Therefore, what we have alone been able to show is that the noumena are the mere results of the power of pure logic, a blind but indispensable function of the soul. As will easily be shown in the next section, the transcendental aesthetic, that is to say, can be treated like the noumena. The Transcendental Deduction is what first gives rise to, thus, the phenomena. As is evident upon close examination, our a posteriori concepts, still, prove the validity of necessity; in view of these considerations, the employment of the paralogisms of practical reason, consequently, can be treated like the Antinomies. The fact is that what is itself given (as we have said) can be seen as full proof that, in spite of the continual experiencedness of multiplicities of the all-embracing consciousness of internal time, a non-being of the phenomenon is conceivable. The objects in space and time, therefore, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the Transcendental Deduction, they stand in need to deductive principles. Galileo tells us that natural causes are the clue to the discovery of the architectonic of human reason, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions.

[Dogmeat]

The Transcendental Deduction, that is to say, is by its very nature contradictory. The architectonic of human reason has lying before it, still, the objects in space and time. The fact is evident, even apodictically evident, that I have the reflection that the phenomenological epoche is given continuously as an objective unity in a multi-form and changeable multiplicity of experiences, which belong determinately to it. Multiplicities of what is itself given denote the universal primal phenomena of experiences. Our a priori knowledge constitutes the whole content for the objects in space and time, and our judgements have nothing to do with the phenomena. It is plain that noematic descriptions can be see as full proof that, in spite of the continual experiencedness of philosophy, a non-being of transcendental subjectivity is possible. The Categories, in respect of the intelligible character, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the Ideal of human reason, they exclude the possibility of a posteriori principles, yet the Antinomies are the clue to the discovery of, in particular, the Antinomies. Therefore, what we have alone been able to show is that the noumena are the mere results of the power of pure logic, a blind but indispensable function of the soul. As will easily be shown in the next section, the transcendental aesthetic, that is to say, can be treated like the noumena. The Transcendental Deduction is what first gives rise to, thus, the phenomena. As is evident upon close examination, our a posteriori concepts, still, prove the validity of necessity; in view of these considerations, the employment of the paralogisms of practical reason, consequently, can be treated like the Antinomies. The fact is that what is itself given (as we have said) can be seen as full proof that, in spite of the continual experiencedness of multiplicities of the all-embracing consciousness of internal time, a non-being of the phenomenon is conceivable. The objects in space and time, therefore, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the Transcendental Deduction, they stand in need to deductive principles. Galileo tells us that natural causes are the clue to the discovery of the architectonic of human reason, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions.

Fine asshole, you win

[Spectatrix]

Fine asshole, you win

Eh, don't be mad. I think he just used the Kant Generator Pro for that.