 Dell E228WFP vs. 2007WFP |
  |
| Dell E228WFP vs. 2007WFP |
 Apr 12 2007, 01:43 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35  |
I was looking on the Dell website and the 22" E228WFP widescreen monitor is on sale for $279 while the 20.1" 2007WFP is on sale for $359. Is the 2007WFP just a newer monitor, hence the upped price?
-------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
 |
 
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 01:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
i use the E228WFP at work. great monitor.
i may have to get one for home a that price. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 10:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 Retired Funk-bringer Group: Moderators Posts: 2,656 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Dallas Member No.: 14 |
i think the WFP has a higher refresh rate.
either way, i want me one of those widescreen monitors, that shits nice. -------------------- WAIT. I'm not finished.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 12:17 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
just at a glance:
E228WFP = 5ms response 2007WFP = 17ms response to me that indicates it's a completely different panel, obviously a cheaper one. the 2007WFP looks like it has more inputs (s-video and composite), and has picture in picture. probably just personal preference, but my guess is the E228 is a better monitor, and that the 2007WFP is a junk panel that they crammed a bunch of accessories into. personally if I'm buying a widescreen monitor that's that big, I'd rather it be 1920x1200 than 1680x1050. on that note... man that 2407WFP looks peachy |
|
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 12:29 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Apr 13 2007, 01:17 PM)  just at a glance: E228WFP = 5ms response 2007WFP = 17ms response to me that indicates it's a completely different panel, obviously a cheaper one. the 2007WFP looks like it has more inputs (s-video and composite), and has picture in picture. probably just personal preference, but my guess is the E228 is a better monitor, and that the 2007WFP is a junk panel that they crammed a bunch of accessories into. personally if I'm buying a widescreen monitor that's that big, I'd rather it be 1920x1200 than 1680x1050. on that note... man that 2407WFP looks peachy Thanks for the input! So basically they bumped the price because of "better" features at the cost of a crappier panel? Where did you find a 1920x1200 22"? I'd be interested in that as well. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 12:31 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
that's what it looks like to me. that 24" one that gets 1920x1200 is at $609
tempting as hell if i didnt have like 50 sq ft of monitors already |
|
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 12:36 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Apr 13 2007, 01:31 PM) that's what it looks like to me. that 24" one that gets 1920x1200 is at $609 tempting as hell if i didnt have like 50 sq ft of monitors already Yeah it's tempting but a little more than I am willing to pay for a couple more inches and better resolution, though it is sweet. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 02:36 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Retired Funk-bringer Group: Moderators Posts: 2,656 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Dallas Member No.: 14 |
yeah, if you're upgrading monitors, and especially if you're going widescreen, there's absolutely zero reason to settle for less than 1920x1200
for the 1080p goodness. -------------------- WAIT. I'm not finished.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 15 2007, 09:44 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
So I think I may get the 24". In the long run it seems to make more sense for the money. Now I just gotta figure out where I will put it.
-------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Apr 15 2007, 01:19 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
I just bought an LG L196W yesterday... Its badass. Kinda off topic...sorry
http://us.lge.com/products/model/detail/co...196WTQ-BF.jhtml |
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 12:21 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Retired Funk-bringer Group: Moderators Posts: 2,656 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Dallas Member No.: 14 |
QUOTE (Hartmann @ Apr 15 2007, 10:44 AM) So I think I may get the 24". In the long run it seems to make more sense for the money. Now I just gotta figure out where I will put it. ow. that would hurt my neck, having to move it just to see my monitor 
-------------------- WAIT. I'm not finished.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2007, 08:35 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
never skimp on screen real estate, that's what i always say
|
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd August 2026 - 03:58 AM |
